Lynley and havers relationship quiz

4 Reasons To Love Lynley | Inspector Lynley Mysteries | Drama Channel

But when Lynley enlists the help of his friends Simon and Deborah St. James, the .. Lynley and DS Barbara Havers but also in the interweaving relationships. From the very first moment they meet - when a scowling Havers barges in on an irritated Lynley at a wedding - their working relationship is fraught with issues of. Sergeant Barbara Havers is at a loss: The daughter of her friend Taymullah Azhar .. I truly adored the original Lynley/Havers relationship and that has been .

Does the lack of characters moving forward result in a certain sameness whenever one picks up a Christie novel?

FAREWELL TO LYNLEY: This Endless Banquet Does Not Satisfy | ahsweetmysteryblog

Perhaps — but then we are focused on the plot, not on how Poirot is getting along. Still, I will be the first to admit that most people are strongly attracted to serialized stories and characters they can follow on an extended basis. We identify with the changes that time and incident have wrought on people we care about.

This quality has made TV addicts of us all. Even Dick Wolf, the creator of the Law and Order franchise, finally acknowledged the power of the serial, making Special Victims Unit his longest running success. Will Olivia find love? Will that blonde detective quit gambling and realize her sister is psycho? I would challenge anyone to start reading Elizabeth George in the middle of her nineteen-book saga and not find oneself totally confused by what is going on.

Some fairly interesting things happen to Lynley over the course of the canon, including a horrific tragedy that, to my mind, brought the whole series crashing down into a depressing bore.

He is decidedly less morose this time around, although his romantic travails with the comely vet feel like an endless spinning of wheels, flavored with some of the worst romantic dialogue I have ever read. Daidre actually says at one point: Who talks like that to her boyfriend?? I reckon people have stuck with George through thick and through thin because of their love of the characters, Havers in particular.

Yet I have to admit that our Barbara irritated me throughout this latest episode, falling back on her old ways and actually casting doubt as to whether her career deserves saving, as Sergeant Nkata made all the sane decisions during this investigation. George seems to require more and more space to tell less and less story, and the last half dozen or so titles have failed to satisfy in the crime department.

Meanwhile, my blogging colleagues are churning out two or three reviews a week, while I have spent the first two weeks of my summer vacation alternately reading and listening to the audiobook of Banquet in my car in a frustrating attempt to speed up this process. Why are her books so long? The rest may be due to her emphasis on the psychology of her characters.

Lynley and Havers return in ‘A Banquet of Consequences’

But her exploration into the darkest impulses of the human mind is pretty superficial in my opinion, often played for shock value without being particularly insightful. I could have told you by the end of her first appearance in the novel that Caroline Goldacre was a mother. Over the course of the next six hundred pages, we learn just how loathsome she was, but we never explore how or why she became this way. Or take her second husband, Alastair MacKerron: Yet those moments between the lovers become essentially the same scene played out, with slight variation, over and over and over again!

The way that storyline played itself out made me want to throttle all three of them!

Lynley and Havers return in ‘A Banquet of Consequences’ | The Seattle Times

The alternating scene structure of Banquet made me feel like I was stuck in a sort of repetitive loop throughout my reading. I actually did not notice my mistake for a long time. In short, the novel feels extremely padded, adding to a sense of deep disappointment by the end. We have seen this phenomenon over and over again, and not just in mysteries. The fifth book in the Song of Ice and Fire Saga is over four hundred pages longer than the first and a hundred times less satisfying.

She can still pen an episode that is incredibly gripping, and then she will drag it down with a compendium of overripe descriptions of minor people or places. But reading them has, as I say, brought up these questions that I would like to open up for discussion. Can a story from this genre sustain itself over eight or nine hundred pages?

Does the serialized nature of the modern mystery create an almost insurmountable obstacle toward the creation of a strongly clued puzzle? There is no doubt that the modern mystery presents a more realistic depiction of how crime decimates a community. Is this move toward realism a good thing for the aficionado of detective novels?

As a lover of complex characters myself, I still feel that Elizabeth George gets bogged down in the inner life of her characters, reducing the reading of her mammoth books to a slow crawl. What do you think? They often do, in an amusingly silly way on seeing a huge castle, Havers says to Lynley "Is your pad in Cornwall this big? But the brilliant bickering is actually significant in this show, and reveals the slow thawing and growing affection between two detectives as different as night and day.

Nathaniel Parker on Choosing Lynley 2. Let's just all agree he has to be one of the most appealing, dashing and downright adorable TV sleuths of all time. And that's pretty remarkable when you also bear in mind how prickly, irritable and unthinkingly arrogant he can so often be.

Of course, it helps that he's played by Nathaniel Parker, whose cut-glass accent and suave charisma makes him such a watchable presence on screen. In fact, with his great head of hair, air of mystery and melancholy, and ability to look really good in dinner jackets, there's something a bit James Bond about Thomas Lynley - James Bond minus the tendency towards casual violence and womanizing, and with extra amounts of genuine concern for justice.

He's tough on the outside and soppy soft on the inside, in that way that can make some men so irresistible, and he's not afraid to put fools in their place. As he once said to an obnoxious, resentful fellow officer: I'd enjoy saving the taxpayers the cost of your pension.

You'll often see them among the various suspects - without warning, the brilliant Bill Nighy's face might suddenly appear. Or you might catch a young and rather cherubic Brendan Coyle in his pre-Downton pomp.

Or the darkly handsome Richard Armitage, perfectly cast as a landowner with sinister secrets. In one episode set in a posh private school we see future Hollywood superstar Henry Cavill, and even as a teenager, even in blazer and tie, he has the square-jawed, matinee idol looks that would later get him cast as Superman. But perhaps the most enjoyable star-spotting moment comes in an episode about a murdered playwright, which sees a young, pre-fame Idris Elba playing a cocky womanizing actor who gets punched in the face by a young, pre-fame James McAvoy.