In unusual snub, Obama to avoid meeting Netanyahu | Reuters
His work to strengthen that relationship places him among Israel's strongest President Obama's strategy on Iran in a speech September 27, before the. Israeli prime minister denies interfering in the US election, but his relationship with Barack Obama grows more antagonistic. States and, as an ally of Mitt Romney's campaign, to make himself a factor in the election". Moreover, though the alliance was never broken off even when relations grew tense President Obama labeled the Palestinian-Israeli peace process as a foreign it likely that the Democrats would suffer losses among Jewish voters in
It also involves maintaining an advanced U. Aegis BMD ships in the eastern Mediterranean, and conducting the largest joint military exercises in history to improve U. During my nearly three years at the Pentagon, I traveled to Israel 13 times and participated in more than meetings with senior Israeli civilian and military officials.
Binyamin Netanyahu gambles on Mitt Romney victory | US news | The Guardian
Although Israel was only one of 14 countries in my portfolio, no other country received that level of attention. My experience represented a small fraction of the high-level interactions between our respective defense and national security establishments. This sustained pattern of security cooperation — which Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak has described as " wide, all-encompassing, and unprecedented " — was not simply an example of bureaucratic inertia.
That is likely why Barak, when asked at a recent forum whether Obama is a friend to Israel, responded: This accounts for his commitment to advancing Israeli-Palestinian peace. At times, the process has been frustrating, and for the moment it appears stalled. But Obama has stuck with it out of a passionate conviction that both Israeli security and the Palestinian quest for dignity depend on it.
Although Romney claims to support a two-state solutionhe said nothing about the issue while in Israel, and he has never outlined his vision for an Israeli-Palestinian peace. On the contrary, when Obama outlined parameters for a final peace accord in that were consistent with the general formula discussed by Israeli and Palestinian negotiators for years, including secure and recognized borders based on the lines with mutually agreed swaps and a nonmilitarized Palestinian state, Romney accused him of " throw[ing] Israel under the bus.
Where the Obama-Netanyahu relationship went wrong | The Times of Israel
Even as Obama has pressed all sides to make peace, he has stood shoulder to shoulder with the Jewish state in the face of mounting international challenges.
I remember sitting in my Pentagon office that night when the phones started ringing off the hook from the White House.
He said he would do everything possible, and this is what he did. I believe we owe him a special debt of gratitude. This testifies to the powerful alliance between Israel and the United States.
Time and again, Obama has mobilized the diplomatic might of the United States to protect Israel, even when doing so generated substantial criticism abroad.
Where the Obama-Netanyahu relationship went wrong
Obama has consistently defended Israel at the United Nations, rejecting the unbalanced Goldstone report, defending Israel over the Gaza flotilla incident with Turkey, and blocking Palestinian attempts to circumvent direct negotiations with Israel and impose an outcome through early recognition of statehood. In doing so, Obama has repeatedly shown his willingness to shield Israelis from international efforts aimed at isolating and delegitimizing the Jewish state.
Obama has also taken aggressive action to counter the threat Israeli leaders describe as their No.
- Binyamin Netanyahu gambles on Mitt Romney victory
- Obama’s rocky relationship with Israel: A timeline
- Obama Has Been Great for Israel
Obama has repeatedly stated that an Iranian nuclear weapon is "unacceptable," and he has committed to using all instruments of U. Security Council Resolution No breakthrough has yet occurred, but as time passes, the pressure continues to build. Obama clearly prefers a diplomatic outcome to the crisis, seeing it as the most sustainable solution. Netanyahu's categoric denial of interference followed a leak by Israeli officials that Obama had declined to meet the Israeli prime minister during his visit to the US later this month.
US officials denied there had been a deliberate rebuff. Some observers believed the story was planted by Netanyahu aides in order to show the president in a poor light for snubbing the leader of one of America's closest allies.
In unusual snub, Obama to avoid meeting Netanyahu
The Israeli leader's fury with Obama appeared to reach a new level after his failed attempt to use the US election to bounce the president into setting clear "red lines" beyond which America will take military action against Iran's nuclear programme. In a press conference — from which footage was taken for the television advertisement — Netanyahu said without red lines, there could be no US-imposed red light to military action.
In contrast, Romney has indicated that an administration led by him would take a more hawkish stance. His chief aide, Dan Senor, hinted that Romney as president would back a unilateral Israeli military strike on Iran.
In July, Netanyahu warmly welcomed Romney to Israel along with his chief financial backer Sheldon Adelson, who is also a staunch supporter of the Israeli prime minister.
The billionaire Adelson owns Israel Hayom, a free newspaper which invariably backs Netanyahu and his rightwing coalition government. During his visit, Romney said: You don't criticise your allies in public to achieve the applause of your foes.